HIAWATHA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AND LAND USE
Presented by Cole Hiniker, Victor T Helin, Vivek Deshpande

INTRODUCTION
With
the recent influx of light rail technology in the
Hiawatha Light Rail Transit
(LRT) has been developed by the Metro Transit and the Metropolitan Council
(local metropolitan planning organization), in cooperation with the
Currently there are 20 light rail
systems operating in the
LAND
USE
Land use planning is an important tool that allows residents to design their communities in ways that suit their needs and desires. The introduction of LRT to the neighborhood presents the opportunity to greatly reshape and develop the communities around it. Neighborhood residents can and should be involved in this process. Creating a plan begins with observation of physical and social aspects of the neighborhood. Once this information is collected, different issues can be identified. People can decide what problems exist, and what could be made better. Next, goals should be set to deal with these issues. Following this step would be coming up with strategies to achieve these goals.
The number and spacing of stops is influenced by the potential transit ridership capture, site, roadway and ROW constraints. In the Hiawatha LRT line there are about 17 stations that have been planned along the route. Many proponents of major transit projects argue that the new systems will result in more efficient land use pattern. They say that by encouraging more dense and compact development patterns, the possibility increases for increase transit trips,
reduced trip making and more multi-purpose trips. However, at the same time such a development is also likely to increase the congestion in the area.
The City of
A major
selling point for the Hiawatha LRT was its development potential. The corridor
chosen was seen as one that connected major employment centers and provided
open space around stations that could drive new transit‑oriented
development.
Issue to be kept in mind while going
through the links and articles
Could there have been a better corridor
for setting up the LRT line?
Is there a better alternative way of
using the existing corridor?
Does light‑rail really attract new
development?
Does the development of LRT through the
city increase congestion?
Does the development of a light rail
transit system increase sprawl?
http://www.compukiss.com/populartopics/travel_transhtm/article975.htm
http://www.apta.com/research/info/online/documents/rail_transit_summary.pdf
http://www.apta.com/research/info/briefings/documents/diaz.pdf
http://www.caed.asu.edu/apa/proceedings03/GANDER/ganderm.htm
http://www.metrocouncil.org/transportation/lrt/stations.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/11/national/11rail.html?oref=regi
www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/lrt/pdf/development_document.pdf
http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2004/10/04_olsond_development/
http://twincities.bizjournals.com/twincities/stories/2004/10/25/story5.html